An evaluation of analysis pipelines for DNA methylation profiling using the Illumina HumanMethylation 450 BeadChip platform

by F. Marabita, M. Almgren, M.E. Lindholm, S. Ruhrmann, F. Fagerström-Billai, M. Jagodic, C.J. Sundberg, T.J. Ekström, A.E. Teschendorff, J. Tegnér, D. Gomez-Cabrero
Year:2013

Bibliography

An evaluation of analysis pipelines for DNA methylation profiling using the Illumina HumanMethylation 450 BeadChip platform
F. Marabita, M. Almgren, M.E. Lindholm, S. Ruhrmann, F. Fagerström-Billai, M. Jagodic, C.J. Sundberg, T.J. Ekström, A.E. Teschendorff, J. Tegnér and D. Gomez-Cabrero
Epigenetics 8(3), 333–46, 2013

Abstract

​The proper identification of differentially methylated CpGs is central in most epigenetic studies. The Illumina HumanMethylation450 BeadChip is widely used to quantify DNA methylation; nevertheless, the design of an appropriate analysis pipeline faces severe challenges due to the convolution of biological and technical variability and the presence of a signal bias between Infinium I and II probe design types. Despite recent attempts to investigate how to analyze DNA methylation data with such an array design, it has not been possible to perform a comprehensive comparison between different bioinformatics pipelines due to the lack of appropriate data sets having both large sample size and sufficient number of technical replicates. Here we perform such a comparative analysis, targeting the problems of reducing the technical variability, eliminating the probe design bias and reducing the batch effect by exploiting two unpublished data sets, which included technical replicates and were profiled for DNA methylation either on peripheral blood, monocytes or muscle biopsies. We evaluated the performance of different analysis pipelines and demonstrated that: (1) it is critical to correct for the probe design type, since the amplitude of the measured methylation change depends on the underlying chemistry, (2) the effect of different normalization schemes is mixed, and the most effective method in our hands were quantile normalization and Beta Mixture Quantile dilation (BMIQ) and (3) it is beneficial to correct for batch effects. In conclusion, our comparative analysis using a comprehensive data set suggests an efficient pipeline for proper identification of differentially methylated CpGs using the Illumina 450K arrays.

DOI: 10.4161/epi.24008

An evaluation of analysis pipelines for DNA methylation profiling.pdf

Keywords

DNA methylation Illumina 450K Microarray Normalization Technical variability
KAUST

"KAUST shall be a beacon for peace, hope and reconciliation, and shall serve the people of the Kingdom and the world."

King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, 1924 – 2015

Contact Us

  • 4700 King Abdullah University of Science and Technology

    Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

     

Quick links

© King Abdullah University of Science and Technology. All rights reserved